Pasta News Network - New Zealand

I’m not going to post about COVID anymore. There’s no reason for me to spend my time convincing people not to take these vaccines, as I did throughout 2021. The writing is on the wall by now. The problem hasn’t ended either, excess mortality in 2022 is higher than in 2020 and 2021 and we just had a massive wave from the most brain-damaging COVID variant seen so far, BA.5.

You interfered in the evolutionary dynamics of a sarbecovirus, leading to massive unprecedented waves of infection in the middle of summer and we’ll now find out what the long term repercussions will be. I think it will look like accumulating brain damage and immune damage leading to “mysterious” excess mortality, but time will tell, assuming you’ll still have the cognitive capacity to recognize what happened of course.

But the reason I’m done with this subject is because people don’t really care about understanding any of this.

Dutch bro, no. :(

Project Veritas just released a new video, this one featuring a Jordon Trishton Walker, director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning at Pfizer.

Now maybe the guy is a loon and nothing he says is trustworthy. I’m simply reporting to you what he said.

What he said is damaging enough, though, that the army of Americans who have televisions for brains immediately questioned whether he really held the position that Project Veritas said he did. That attempt was a dead end, since it’s been verified that he is indeed the the person he and Project Veritas both claim he is.

Here’s a sample of what Walker says in the hidden-camera video.

Transcript of the Project Veritas video that has now hit 40+ million views.

I was sceptical at first, but given silence from the usual characters, a press statement from Pfizer, senate questions and the overall state of clown world, I have to consider that this is a legitimate statement from a legitimate employee.

This is what Pfizer had to say about the video in a statement on its official company website (passages of particular significance have been bolded by the editor):

Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight.

In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research. Working with collaborators, we have conducted research where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern. This work is undertaken once a new variant of concern has been identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way for us to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to induce antibodies that neutralize a newly identified variant of concern. We then make this data available through peer reviewed scientific journals and use it as one of the steps to determine whether a vaccine update is required.

Translation: Our "Media & Crisis Teams" are going to be very busy over the next few weeks.

A basic tenet of public health practice is that it is underpinned by evidence and human rights. Has public health been replaced with something else over time? We look at the use of propaganda published as “science” and consider whether science, academia and medicine have been misappropriated.

"What was revealed to me in the past 2.5 years is the decades of control and techniques that the pharmaceutical industry has, to corrupt science … Science is horrifically corrupted … I learned about the history of the pharmaceutical industry … a documented criminal industry … its entire business model rests on destroying what are called repurposed or generic drugs." ~ Dr Pierre Kory

Likewise currently 203 results for "the benefits of COVID vaccines outweigh the risks" on a large collection of papers that likely would not have been published without this "disclaimer"

Worth reading in full.

There are two key points regarding post vaccination heart issues that HART have been raising concerns about since early 2021.

• Myocarditis is attributable to injection not infection
• What has been diagnosed may represent wider harm that is yet to be properly measured

Data from multiple sources now concur on important points. However, there is data from England which appears contradictory.

It’s the injections not the infections that cause myocarditis

The data keeps piling on. Dr. McCullough has recently said 742 papers on heart damage after vaccination at this point.

In the story Watership Down a group of rabbits flee their home warren of Sandleford, ahead of its imminent destruction at the hands of real estate developers. They set out looking for a safe, new home and among their adventures they encounter another warren called Cowslip. There, all the rabbits are uncharacteristically large, affable and seemingly well fed. For awhile, the Sandleford rabbits think they’ve found a safe haven.

There’s only one problem: every once in awhile one of the the rabbits goes missing. It turns out the entire warren is on a farmer’s land who feeds and otherwise takes care of them, but then sets out snares and traps them from time to time for their pelts.

There is only one rule at Cowslip’s Warren, nobody is allowed to ask or talk about any of the missing rabbits.

Good questions are being asked here:

• How many people do you know who died of COVID?
• How many people do you know who died “suddenly and unexpectedly” over the last 18 months?
• When will the corporate media face the music?

"We’re one tragedy away from pitchforks and torches"

If time poor, go straight to the end.

I had always thought a primary job of the press was to be skeptical of power—especially the power of the government. But during the Covid-19 pandemic, I and so many others found that the legacy media had shown itself to largely operate as a messaging platform for our public health institutions. Those institutions operated in near total lockstep, in part by purging internal dissidents and discrediting outside experts.

Twitter became an essential alternative. It was a place where those with public health expertise and perspectives at odds with official policy could air their views—and where curious citizens could find such information. This often included other countries’ responses to Covid that differed dramatically from our own.

But it quickly became clear that Twitter also seemed to promote content that reinforced the establishment narrative, and to suppress views and even scientific evidence that ran to the contrary.

From 2021:

White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci acknowledged in 2012 that controversial “gain-of-function” research carried the “remote” possibility of triggering a pandemic, but argued the benefits would “outweigh the risks,” according to remarks newly unearthed as worldwide COVID-19 deaths near 3.6 million.

Last month, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) confronted Fauci during a Senate hearing over the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) role in funding gain-of-function (GOF) research — which involves intentionally strengthening viruses to better study their potential effects — at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Such research could have given birth to COVID-19.

Just another day in the megadustrial complex.

Gene therapy and cell engineering specialist Dr Alina Chan has doggedly pursued an investigation into the origins of the pandemic.

In the coming year, it is possible that evidence will finally emerge proving that experiments to soup-up coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) led to the accidental release of Covid. ‘Right now it’s not safe for people who know about the origin of the pandemic to come forward,’ she told MPs at a session of the Science and Technology Select Committee in 2021. ‘But we live in an era where there is so much information being stored that it will eventually come out.’

In the aftermath of the world’s catastrophic response to Covid-19, some governments have begun conducting inquiries into what went wrong. Yet owing to a combination of politics, face-saving, and outright corruption, these inquiries have generally been toothless. For example, a report published last year by the UK House of Commons concluded, backwardly, that if the UK had gone into strict lockdown three days sooner, disaster would have been averted.

Conclusions like these are as insulting to the public’s intelligence as was the response to Covid itself. The response to Covid led to the sharpest economic collapse since the Great Depression, global famine, a mental health crisis, runaway inflation, a transfer of over $3 trillion from the world’s poorest to the very richest, the premature deaths of hundreds of thousands of young people, and the worst education crisis since the Second World War.

50 key questions, of how suddenly in dealing with Covid, established protocols were ignored and new ones were invented.

Elon Musk on Monday released another Twitter files drop: How Twitter rigged the Covid debate:

• By censoring info that was true but inconvenient to US government policy
• By discrediting doctors and other experts who disagreed
• By suppressing ordinary users, including some sharing the CDC’s own data

So far the Twitter Files have focused on evidence of Twitter’s secret blacklists; how the company functioned as a kind of subsidiary of the FBI; and how execs rewrote the platform’s rules to accommodate their own political desires.

The United States government pressured Twitter and other social media platforms to elevate certain content and suppress other content about Covid-19.

I’ll try to avoid repeating what we already addressed in the previous two articles on this subject. After mRNA vaccination the immune response against Spike is shifting to IgG4, which is how your body responds after repeat exposure to stuff it needs to tolerate, like bee venom, pollen or peanut proteins.

You just don’t want to see an IgG4 response to a respiratory infection. Out of the IgG’s, it’s mainly IgG3 and some IgG1 you want to see. One of the authors claims that it doesn’t matter that they’re switching to IgG4, because the antibodies don’t just matter for triggering phagocytosis (your immune cells eating the virus particles), they also matter for neutralization.

And thus another horseman of the immunity apocalypse appears.

A fearless, selfless Israeli researcher named David Shuldman has worked tirelessly to get data released from the clutches of Government agencies. He recently obtained data via FOIA request on neonatal deaths from the Israeli health insurance fund Maccabi, which covers about 25% of Israelis.

Neonatal deaths are defined as deaths in the first four weeks of life, from the moment after birth until 28 days later. Recently, he obtained data on the quarterly number of neonatal deaths beginning the first quarter of 2019. Here is what that looks like.

If the birth numbers have not improved this time next year, prepare for awkward.

From 2020 / 2021:

A PCR test is amplifying samples through repetitive cycles. The lower the virus concentration in the sample, the more cycles are needed to achieve a positive result. Many US labs work with 35 to 45 cycles, while many European labs work with 30 to 40 cycles.

The research group of French professor Didier Raoult has recently shown that at a cycle threshold (ct) of 25, about 70% of samples remained positive in cell culture (i.e. were infectious); at a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive; at a ct of 35, 3% of samples remained positive; and at a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in cell culture (see diagram).

This means that if a person gets a “positive” PCR test result at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is less than 3%. The chance that the person received a “false positive” result is 97% or higher.

As a companion to today's academic paper and Substack article regarding PCR and scientific due diligence.

In New Zealand, this OIA request shows 40 cycles was used.

Weeks after Pfizer and its partner BioNTech announced they started a rolling submission of documents for approval of their COVID-19 vaccine, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official penned a memorandum authorizing the release of a Biologics License Application (BLA) number for the shot even as regulators weighed whether to approve the BLA, one of the documents shows.

“This deviation from our normal practice is done to facilitate product labeling and distribution and is consistent with other Center practices to facilitate vaccine delivery during the declared Public Health Emergency,” Christopher Joneckis, the FDA’s associate director for review management, wrote in the June 17, 2021, memo.

This is fine.

Pfizer was required by the U.S. and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct multiple studies on its vaccine after the FDA approved the shot in August 2021 because regulators determined that without the studies, there would not be sufficient data to assess the “known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis,” or heart inflammation and a related condition.

Regulators were also concerned about the potential risk of subclinical myocarditis, or heart inflammation without typical symptoms.

The FDA told Pfizer to carry out six studies, with various deadlines for completion and reporting final results to the agency. The first final deadline arrived on Dec. 31, 2022.

If the FDA did their work, they would already know the answer.

Meanwhile, everything is still fine according to the TGA and Medsafe.

In May 2021 The Lancet (supposedly the most prestigious medical journal in the world) published an article describing the largest observational study (covering most of the population of Israel) into the effectiveness of the Pfizer covid vaccine.

Its claim of 95% effectiveness – which happened to be exactly the same figure claimed by Pfizer in its original Phase 3 randomised controlled trial – was widely used as the ultimate confirmation of how incredibly effective the vaccine was (the study did not consider safety at all, but more on that below). But the study was flawed in many ways and on 17 May 2021 we submitted a rapid response (just 250 words) to The Lancet explaining why the claim was exaggerated.

The Lancet and the NEJM have interesting interpretations of what "Conflicts of Interest" entails when it comes to Covid related papers.

Trust the Authorities, trust the Experts, and trust the Science, we were told. Public health messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic was only credible if it originated from Government health authorities, the World Health Organisation and pharmaceutical companies, as well as scientists who parroted their lines with little critical thinking.

In the name of ‘protecting’ the public, the authorities have gone to great lengths to create an illusion of consensus about the appropriate response to COVID-19 – as described in the recently released Twitter files that document collusion between the FBI and social media platforms. They suppressed ‘the truth’, even when emanating from highly credible scientists, undermining scientific debate and preventing the correction of scientific errors.

Excellent article, plenty of juicy inner-links that make it worth sharing with normies.

Some vaccine advisers to the federal government say they’re “disappointed” and “angry” that government scientists and the pharmaceutical company Moderna didn’t present a set of infection data on the company’s new Covid-19 booster during meetings last year when the advisers discussed whether the shot should be authorized and made available to the public.

That data suggested the possibility that the updated booster might not be any more effective at preventing Covid-19 infections than the original shots.

The data was early and had many limitations, but several advisers told CNN that they were concerned about a lack of transparency.

A little late for that now. I wonder why this sudden 180 though.

Andrew Bridgen, the British politician suspended as a Conservative MP over allegations of being anti-Semitic in a tweet criticising the Covid vaccines, has been defended by the Jewish Israeli academic whose article he linked to in the tweet in question.

Dr. Josh Guetzkow, a senior lecturer in criminology and sociology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told the Daily Sceptic that as a Jew living in Israel he was “surprised” by the accusations against Mr. Bridgen, because “there is nothing at all anti-Semitic about his statement”.

Meanwhile:

Dr. Guetzkow has pointed out that Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav has been drawing parallels between the extreme and discriminatory public health measures during the pandemic and the Holocaust throughout the the last three years.

Tee Hee.

Andrew Bridgen has been suspended as a Conservative MP for spreading misinformation about Covid vaccination.

It comes after the North West Leicestershire MP posted a tweet that compared vaccines to the Holocaust.

Tory chief whip Simon Hart said the comments had "crossed a line" and caused great offence.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak also condemned the remarks, calling the comparison "utterly unacceptable".

A fun example of damage control. No less then 3 times does the BBC assure us that a certain pharmaceutical product is and has been "safe and effective". Everyone took the bait.

A nurse friend who did not want to hear when I first questioned Covid jab safety two years ago is now furious about having been bludgeoned by the NHS into having three shots. She survived the first two but had massive bleeding after the third. Looking more deeply into the data, she found to her horror that the ‘safe and effective’ claim is completely unfounded.

I suspect there are hundreds of thousands of other healthcare workers feeling the same sense of betrayal, and that this is contributing in a major way to the current staffing crisis.

My friend’s experience is exactly in line with new figures from Australia showing a dramatic dose-response relationship between the number of jabs and the risk of having to go into hospital with Covid or dying from it.

New Zealand can continue to pretend there is no problem, but almost every Western nation followed the same treatment protocols and vaccine roll-out.

On 21 December 2022, we filed a case in the High Court of Australia against Brendan Murphy, Secretary of the Department of Health to stop TGA's provisional approval of Moderna for use of its product (Spikevax) in children aged six months to five years old in Australia.

In Australia, only an applicant with "standing" can bring a case to court. This means that an applicant needs to have the legal authority to bring a case; they need to show that they have a "special interest" in the matter and that they are truly "a person aggrieved" by the decision that has been made.

We want to bring a case straight to the High Court with one primary argument:

An interest in preserving human life is the ultimate special interest, and our case must be allowed to proceed.

Then, if the High Court agrees, the door will be open for us to present the evidence and data to show that the provisional approvals must immediately be halted in Australia.

Tall order, but they have truth by their side and the evidence keeps piling up.

Perhaps Dr Kerryn Phelps and her wife, in their disclosure just before Christmas 2022 admitting that they had suffered severe side effects from their Covid vaccines, would agree. But why are we no longer seeing the daily media parade at 11 am from Health Ministers, regulators, and fringe-dwelling health bureaucrats with little to no clinical experience with Covid addressing the serious adverse effects and deaths from vaccines?

If we recall, government Ministers and bureaucrats across the country all marched to the beat of the same drum – get vaccinated as the alternative of being ostracised. Losing your livelihood and being publicly ridiculed was too much for the majority. We could not move outside a 5km radius, work, or visit loved ones for fear of transmitting the virus unless we were injected. Strangely the Supreme Court held that this was not coercion, because apparently you had a choice as to whether you wanted to work or travel outside the ‘5km bubble’, but of course, this was predicated on whether you had the jab.

Sobering and honest writing by lawyer Tony Nikolic.

Long form, worth reading in full.

All institutional checks on overreach and abuse of executive power – every single one of them, from legislatures to the judiciary, human rights machinery, professional associations, trade unions, the Church and the media – turned out to be not fit for purpose and folded just when they were most needed. Waystations on the journey to where we are today with a biosecurity-cum-biofascist state include the national security, administrative and surveillance states.

And so Ramesh Thakur finishes his 5-part series. An optimistic end note, but we all know institutions loathe relinquishing any form of power that makes it easy to impede upon liberties.

I present the masking ‘body of evidence’ below (n=167 studies and pieces of evidence), comprised of comparative effectiveness research as well as related evidence and high-level reporting. To date, the evidence has been stable and clear that masks do not work to control the virus and they can be harmful and especially to children.

The Berlin court may want to pay attention to this one.

A doctor in Berlin, Germany was sentenced to two years in jail for illegally writing over 4,000 exemptions from wearing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic, ABC News reports.

In addition to the prison sentence, a regional court in the southwestern town of Weinheim handed her a three-year work ban and a 28,000 euro ($29,550) fine - the amount she received for issuing the certificates. Her office assistant was fined 2,700 euros.

During the trial the defendant had argued that wearing masks was harmful to people’s health.

This. She is not wrong.

Already by early- and mid-2020, hard data should have rung alarm bells on the doomsday narrative being peddled by modelers like Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London of catastrophic mortality counts without lockdown.

Data were readily available from the Diamond Princess cruise ship (712 of 3,711 elderly people on board were infected and 14 died), Sweden, the USS Theodore Roosevelt (736 of the 4,085 young and fit sailors who disembarked tested positive, 6 were hospitalised and 1 died) and the Charles de Gaulle (60 percent of 1,767 crew members tested positive, 24 were admitted to hospital and two to ICU, with no reported deaths)

Why then did the so-called health and infectious diseases experts keep calling for lockdown?

An on-going series by Ramesh Thakur.

One of the most brilliant is a mouse called Jikky, a whistleblowing rodent from the CSIRO laboratory in Geelong where scientists research animal diseases and biosecurity, and have collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on bat coronaviruses.

Just after Christmas, Jikky (whose pronouns are mouse/mouseself) revealed that documents released by Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in response to two freedom of information (FOI) requests show that of the 382 batches of Covid vaccines monitored by the TGA, 10 are associated with multiple deaths. Moreover, of these ‘death’ batches, four appear to be contaminated with unexplained fragments of mRNA and five of these ‘death’ batches had had their shelf life extended by up to 11 months.

Rebecca Weisser has done some excellent write ups lately and this one certainly does not disappoint.

Seeing Jikky getting a well deserved mention is just lovely.

Worth reading in full.

Last June, a paper by a team that included the British Medical Journal editor Peter Doshi concluded that data from the Pfizer and Moderna trials indicated their vaccines are more likely to put people in hospital from adverse effects than keep them out by protecting against Covid, by 2.4 and 6.4 people per 10,000, respectively. They concluded:

The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious Covid-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death

Another peer-reviewed study, published in the BMJ Journal of Medical Ethics on 5 December, looked at the net benefit-harm ratio of a third vaccine for 18–29 year olds (that is, university students). According to its findings, for every one Covid hospitalisation prevented in this group by an mRNA booster shot over a six-month period, 18.5 serious adverse events would occur, including 1.5-4.6 booster-associated myopericarditis cases in males (typically requiring hospitalisation).

An on-going series by Ramesh Thakur.

The two fake doctors, whose accounts urged extreme caution about Covid-19, were part of a network of at least four fake accounts that touted their ties to the LGBTQ+ community, vocally advocated for mask-wearing and social distancing, and dished out criticism to those they felt were not taking the pandemic seriously.

The Honeymans could not be reached for comment, as they do not exist. At publication time, Robert Honeyman’s account was no longer active.

Never take social media at face value.

Dr. Yusuf Saleeby has practiced medicine for more than 30 years. He serves patients in South Carolina and until recently had never faced an investigation from his state medical board.

But after Saleeby started prescribing ivermectin to his patients, he was reported to the board, which opened an investigation, despite the state’s attorney general’s promise that his office wouldn’t prosecute doctors who prescribed off-label medications.

Jennifer Wright, a nurse practitioner and clinical director who practices in Florida, but can prescribe across state lines, told The Epoch Times she received a letter from the Office of the Attorney General of New York ordering her not to prescribe ivermectin.

“You know, basically threatened me. If I don’t stop prescribing, then they’re going to fine me,” Wright said about the letter, which threatened legal action with fines of up to $5,000 per violation.

Debating wether Ivermectin works for Covid is not relevant, the fact is that politics and vested interests got in the way of the doctor / patient relationship in many Western nations.

Atleast the TGA and Medsafe did not make cringy horse jokes.

The real-world effectiveness of Covid vaccines has not matched the hype of the 95 percent efficacy claimed in manufacturer trials on the basis of which they were granted emergency-use authorisation. They’ve proven disappointingly leaky with a surprisingly swift waning of effectiveness, necessitating boosters every few months.

In many cases vaccine rollouts coincided with an upsurge in infections, substantiating the concerns expressed by many experts that a mass vaccination campaign in the middle of a pandemic will drive the evolution of vaccine-escape variants and generate self-perpetuating waves of infections from the mutating variants.

Rather then "Safe and Effective" the real world is showing "Unsafe and destructive".

Sobering reading penned by Ramesh Thakur.

Doctors in Japan are now investigating the link between the experimental Covid vaccine and the unprecedented numbers of people dying suddenly.

Two more professors are speaking out against the vaccine.

Professor Masataka Nagao of Hiroshima University School of Medicine in Japan, a medical specialist in forensic medicine, performed an autopsy together with authorities of more than a hundred bodies a year.

Autopsy is the only way to properly ascertain truths. Japan may well be the nation that breaks the proverbial dam.

The three major controversies over pandemic management for the past three years have been lockdown measures, universal masking recommendations and mandates, and Covid vaccines.

The last was a pharmaceutical intervention using revolutionary new technology. The first two were radical departures from the existing scientific and policy consensus as encapsulated in official documents from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and in several national pandemic preparedness plans. They established the willingness of the state to dictate every aspect of people’s lives, down to the most ridiculous and absurd details.

A sobering essay by the inimitable Ramesh Thakur.

Worth reading in full.

Anthony Fauci is finally gone from his government perch. Let us recall that it was he who set this calamity in motion, squandering his credibility, while taking down public health and much else with it. More than anyone, he bears responsibility, even if he was acting on others’ behalf. That is especially true if he was carrying out a hidden agenda (take your pick of theories).

There was already growing political and societal panic on March 11, 2020, when the House Oversight and Reform Committee convened a hearing on the new virus circulating. Fauci was the key witness. The only question on everyone’s mind came down to the most primal fear: am I going to die from this thing, like in the movies?

How "The Science" got science wrong in the early days of the plandemic.

On November 25th there occurred a singularly rare event in the ongoing COVID-19 saga – truth was spoken to power. A distinguished medical doctor and infectious disease expert was given free rein to interrogate a government official, unmediated and without apparent time restraint. The doctor in question was the distinguished oncologist, professor emeritus at Kyoto university and Director and Chairman of the Translational research Information Centre (Tri) Masanori Fukushima. His rigorous and passionate berating of an official from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) on COVID-19 vaccine safety and government transparency made for gripping viewing. A recording swiftly went viral, elevating Doctor Fukushima to a new status as leading critic of the COVID-19 vaccines in Japan.

Based Professor. He is not wrong, going by the data.

When did the coronavirus first appear and begin spreading? Did it emerge in December in the Huanan wet market, or did it leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in November, or was it intentionally released at the World Military Games in October? Was it spreading internationally during autumn 2019? Has it been around for years?

Here I’ll present evidence that the coronavirus appeared at some point in the second half of 2019 and was spreading globally during that autumn and winter.

Confirms a starting point in Italy, which lines up with known suggestions. Nothing about Canada though.

There is now evidence to suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was interpreted by the US as a national security threat in early 2020.

Furthermore, there appears to be strong evidence that the United States Department of Defense (DoD) was and still is, in full control of the Covid Vaccine development program, including the clinical trials, development, manufacturing, quality assurance, distribution, and administration since early 2020.

The major pharmaceutical companies, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Moderna, Novavax, Biotech/Pfizer, and Sanofi, have been involved as “Project Coordination Teams” acting under contract to the US Department of Defense.

"Coincidences" are a contributing cause to died suddenly.

Unfortunate that the original source is behind a paywall.

In a submission to the national Inquiry into Long COVID and Repeated COVID Infections (Submission #510), Dr Phelps details her injury of dysautonomia, as well as that of her wife, former school teacher Jackie Stricker-Phelps, who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine. Specialists have linked both women’s injuries to their Covid vaccinations and told Dr Phelps that they have seen “a lot” of patients in a similar situation.

National coverage of Dr Phelp’s story marks a new level of media coverage and public awareness around Covid vaccine injury. Seemingly overnight, eye rolls and ‘anti-vax’ smears are notably absent from reporting. High-profile personalities have also stepped forward with their stories of Covid vaccine injury (Prof Gemma Carey and ABC journalist Eleni Roussos).

The new willingness of the mainstream media to openly discuss vaccine injury could not come soon enough for the growing cohort of everyday Australians suffering in the shadows.

The dam is slowly breaking. Lets see what happens now that Anthony "I am the science" Fauci has now officially retired.