Pasta News Network - New Zealand

This is going to be long so grab a beer or a cup of tea and settle in. I need to take you on a journey in time and show you how the capture of the judiciary in Nazi Germany has been directly mirrored in Australia today. And this capture is the primary reason why employee mandates - for investigational gene therapies - have been allowed to be implemented despite a promise to the world in 1947 that this would never happen again.

Highlight:

As a point of circular interest, section 51.23a of the Australian constitution was implemented as a direct result of the Nuremberg doctors’ trial. It was specifically included to prohibit conscription of doctors by the state:

“the provision of maternity allowances, widows' pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;”

"Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn't there?" - V.

"An exposé of syringe fundamentalism in Australia's Fair Work Commission"

What Deputy President Coleman is effectively saying is that unless evidence can be brought to the FWC exceeding the infallible authority of ATAGI’s council of 15 ‘mouth-of-god’ prophet-experts, he cannot be persuaded to believe any other view regarding vaccines. To say this standard of evidence is far beyond what is reasonable in a Commission, not even a court, is an understatement and reinforces my earlier claim that the FWC itself has institutionalised injustice. Suppose a single mother is fired from her cashier job because of a vaccine mandate. In order to overrule ATAGI’s ‘authority’, she must come to that hearing bearing evidence exceeding ATAGI, or else with evidence utterly destroying ATAGI’s credibility as said ‘authority’. Neither are possible for common folk; it wasn’t even possible for Dr. Petrovsky. And thus we have institutionalised injustice; a bar of evidence is set higher than the Cosmic Mountain where only angels can fly. Us ‘normal’ people just have to grin and bear it.

Government says so.

However, even after studying and watching everything possible, for me, one single character always remained a great mystery: it is the "good German". This person was the normal citizen of Germany, not radical, but who did not react when the Holocaust occurred. He was part of a society that accepted the elimination of 6 million Jews with a terrifying normality.

It wasn't five or ten thousand people. It was six million. From within Germany, the Jewish population was relevant: 566,000 citizens. Therefore, practically every German had contact with some Jewish family. They were a society that lived in reasonable harmony. Ordinary Germans went to Jewish businesses. Germans had Jewish employees. Their children attended the same schools. They all went to the same clubs, the same restaurants, and played sports together. Friendships were common and natural.

Less than ten years later, how do you, an ordinary citizen, accept that a family of neighbors is removed on trains to concentration camps? How do you accept that your Jewish friend's neighborhood business is closed, with the owners removed from society, without any protest?

Presented, without further comment.

After 2 long years and in response to continuing pressure, the TGA appeared to relent and on 1 September 2022 invited submissions from health professionals and the public in relation to relaxing the prescribing conditions surrounding ivermectin and allowing health practitioners to prescribe the drug off-label for the management of COVID-19. Initially, I gave the TGA “benefit of the doubt” and thought that they had finally decided to do the right thing and relax the restrictive prescribing conditions surrounding ivermectin……….it seems like my faith was misplaced.

I compiled an extensive submission to the TGA (fully referenced) and this was submitted 28 September 2022. A copy is attached. However, after more than 3 months there appears to be no sign the TGA will do the right thing. I am now of the opinion that the Australian TGA are slow-walking this submission. It is within the power of the Australian TGA to reverse this tragic and restrictive prescribing policy immediately in the national interest. They could do it overnight!

PDF at the bottom of the article has all the goods. A 101 pages of material.

If pressed for time:

• Opening Points: 36, 70 - 72, 105 - 109
• letters to NCCET: Page 88 - 90, Page 97 - 101

They really have no choice anymore at this point, the cumulative damage / risk from the vaccines is well proven and Paxlovid is not delivering on its promises.

The Absolute Risk Reduction is the actual reduction in risk of something happening in a population. So if you have two groups and 20% of the untreated group get the disease but only 12% of the treated group get the disease the ARR is 8%. In laymans’ terms you could say that you have an 8 in 100 chance of getting a benefit from the treatment. An excellent and fuller explanation is here in a free book chapter.

It’s really the measure that should be used for vaccines and other drug treatments but is very dependent on your prior risk of something. If your risk of the same thing was 2% (e.g. because you’re younger) and it dropped by the same proportion on treatment to 1.2%, the ARR would be 0.8% - similar to that touted as the result in the Pfizer study.

Because the level of reduction or impact of a drug might be consistent across different groups, irrespective of their background risk, and because it sounds more impressive, drug companies will often use the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) - which is just the % drop in the incidence rate.

ARR vs RRR, calculated from official data.

(((They))) knew.

it seems like you cannot swing a sack of desperate epidemiologists around your head these days without hitting another “model” claiming that “vaccines saved upmteen squinjillion lives” but i fear these these weapons of mass deception are just overwrought GIGO engines that run on bad assumption, bad data, and worse study design/definitional hijinks.

but there is a simple truth test to these matters: if these vaccines were anything like as efficacious as claimed, dosing them into 70%+ of populations (and 90-95% of high risk of death populations) then they would be bending the covid curves like neutrons stars bend spacetime.

the effects would not be subtle.

And rest assured, the "bends" we now have are not going go away any time soon.

The COVID experimental emergency medical countermeasures (EEMCs, as separate and distinct from pharmaceuticals) produced under the command and control of the US. of Defense (currently referred to as “COVID-19 vaccines) have caused more deaths and serious adverse events than any drug in the history of the pharmaceutical industry. Hundreds of thousands or even millions of people have likely died yet drug regulators (including the US FDA and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, TGA) around the world continue to say they are “safe and efficacious” and usually produce only mild or only rare serious adverse effects (eg heart inflammation, blood clots, strokes, death etc)?

What allows the kabuki theatre to continue despite people of all ages, including children, dying in huge numbers since the introduction of the EEMCs? How can this go on any longer?

Based Altman, now has a Substack and is not pulling any punches.

Far from being an obscure immunology topic, knowledge about the IgG4 antibody subclass (intended by nature for allergens and such) being suboptimal for immune response to a replicating virus such as Sars-Cov-2 was well known in immunology.

Even Dr. Fauci co-authored a 2015 Science Translational Medicine study that negatively spoke of IgG4 antibodies from repeat injections as undesirable in vaccine response.

Much like VAIDS, ADE, VADE and friends.

Introducing "foreign" proteins into the body is something that should be done with great care.

In the October 2022 version of the FAA Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, the FAA quietly widened the EKG parameters beyond the normal range (from a PR max of .2 to unlimited). And they didn’t widen the range by a little. They widened it by a lot. It was done after the vaccine rollout.

This is extraordinary. They did it hoping nobody would notice. It worked for a while. Nobody caught it.

But you can’t hide these things for long.

This is a tacit admission from the US government that the COVID vaccine has damaged the hearts of our pilots. Not just a few pilots. A lot of pilots and a lot of damage.

Internet whispers suggest that the (((elite))) are actively courting un-vaccinated pilots for their private air transports.

I just got off the phone with Megan Mansell who is an expert on industrial hygiene including face masks and respirators. She told me she challenged former US Surgeon General Jerome Adams on his advice about face masks on Twitter.

Adams indignantly asked her for her qualifications.

She then rattled through her long list of qualifications. Suffice it to say, there are only a few people in America who are more qualified to speak on this subject than she is. And none of them will challenge what she says.

Adams, realizing he was talking to someone capable of calling him out, then did what any legitimate scientist would do when challenged: he blocked her on Twitter!

Sad! Many such cases.

(And more to come no doubt.)

The AMA’s Code of Ethics states that doctors must, “consider first the well-being of the patient,” (Article 2.1.1) and that they must provide full informed consent before undertaking any tests, treatments or procedures (Article 2.1.4). Dr Price says that AHPRA’s position statement and hawkish regulatory behaviour put the public health agenda before the patient and made it “impossible” for doctors to provide valid informed consent to patients.

AHPRA’s unilateral decision that all doctors must fall in line with the vaccination rollout was also in conflict with the AMA Code’s provision that doctors may conscientiously object to providing certain treatments or procedures (Article 2.1.13), and that they may publicly state opinions contrary to the status quo (Article 4.3.3). Further, the Code requires that doctors “practise effective stewardship, the avoidance or elimination of wasteful expenditure in health care...” (Article 4.4.1), and that they use their “knowledge and skills to assist those responsible for allocating health care resources, advocating for their transparent and equitable allocation.” (Article 4.4.3) These articles imply a responsibility for doctors to speak out and take action when they believe that public health policy could be improved upon.

And this is how you loose good doctors and nurses.

Neil, are you serious that the vaccine has saved “tens of millions” of people from dying from COVID like you said at timestamp 16:40 in this YouTube video.

I don’t think you are serious.

But let’s put it to the test.

The same Mr. Tyson that exults the virtues of being curious, learning and asking questions about everything, but do not do that when it comes to vaccines.

Am disappointed, thought he was better then that. See timestamp 3:52 - 5:02.

Neil is running for cover just as expected. He ignored my email and text messages.

With animals, there is no such database. mRNA vaccines in the “animal health” or veterinary markets are difficult to track until the company or the USDA is ready to release information on that product’s development or release. The USDA and/or the NIH have no mechanism for tracking potential new vaccines, drugs or biologics for the animal market.

Therefore, one must rely on press releases, the occasional peer reviewed paper, conference notes, USDA grant and contract notifications, university websites and company profiles for discovery of such new products. Not adequate, in my opinion, and most definitely not transparent. By federal law, the public should have open access to the results of this type of federally funded research.

In today’s substack, the state of mRNA “vaccines” for animal “health” is discussed. Citing public sources, I will review what is known and not known about commercial liaisons and partnerships, the corporations involved, ongoing research and products in various states of development.

Dr. Malone then proceeds with listing a number of articles which should raise an eyebrow.

This is fine.

After three booster campaigns in 2022, the Japanese are now in a league of their own among mRNA consuming countries, administering far more boosters than countries that had far more coercive vax campaigns.

Japanese over 65 have done their best to reduce Japan’s 612-million-dose stockpile of mRNA jabs, with 3rd, 4th, and 5th jab rates of 91%, 82.5%, and 56%, respectively. But unfortunately, Japan has started 2023 by reporting its highest ever daily Covid death tolls. During the booster era starting in early 2022, each wave has been noticeably higher than the last.

The cumulative effects of mRNA vaccines at work.

What makes this even more awkward is that Covid is far less lethal nowadays putting into question why many countries still push 2021-era health protocols.

Nicola Davis of The Guardian purports to claim that cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra somehow ‘hijacked’ an announcer-led interview that the BBC invited him to give on reducing the risks of a heart attack or stroke primarily with drugs known as Statins.

As expected, Gates-funded ‘anti-vaxxer’ whipping boy Full Fact were none-too-shy to step into the fray. While admitting that Covid-19 vaccines have killed some people, Full Fact’s writer Leo Benedictus misdirected readers in his disjointed hit-piece on Dr Malhotra’s interview with the scientifically dubious claim that excess deaths would have been higher without the covid-19 vaccines… as if that was ever true or even relevant to this particular discussion.

The same 'The Guardian' that did a hit piece on Australian Professor Borody for trying to get a Covid treatment through based on ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline back in 2021.

Meanwhile, out comes the playbook. Those heart attack headlines are worth a chuckle. This is what passes for journalism in these modern times.

In summary:

• On 6 May 2021 The Lancet published a blatantly flawed study of the effectiveness of the Pfizer covid vaccine on the population of Israel, claiming it was 95% effective.

• On 17 May 2021 we submitted a rapid response 250 word letter explaining why the study was flawed.

• After an initial response saying they would ask the authors for a response to our letter we heard nothing until 20 months later.

The gatekeepers say: "We do not like your opinion and reject it as misinformation."

Awkward.

What this means, is that the unique ability of this typically rare subclass of antibody to switch out its arms, makes it unable to act out the things that I described above that IgG1 can do. Namely, form immune complexes and bind receptors on cells for removal of unwanted cells. So those three ways: the ADCC, ADCP and CDC - that aid in removal of unwanted cells are all nullified in the scenario where IgG4 is prevalent. Worse than that, since the subclass switch is literally the by-product of continuous antigen stimulation, then this is an immunological endorsement of a ‘win’ for IgG4 if we consider competition for binding sites. In effect, IgG4 outcompetes IgG1 and thus, the scales tip from tumor suppression, to tumor progression. All because of IgG4.

Considering the whispers about increases in reported cancer cases and what have been called "turbo cancers", this mRNA stuff is looking like it has one hell of a curious long tail.

That’s why I do what I am doing. I want everyone informed as much as they can be, so that they can make up their own minds about what’s best for them, and their families.

I think the conversation about the basics has been intentionally omitted, simply to keep a profit and control machine and enterprise running. People dying and getting perpetually sick is collateral damage, according to this enterprise, and that’s not ok with me. Especially, in the most recent COVID injectables context, since most people still have no idea that these particular injections that are being touted as ‘(conventional) vaccinations’, are no such thing. Not by any stretch of any imagination.

Dear Jessica, Thank You.

I look at things this way when I think about the WEF: hypothetically speaking, if a gang decides to get together once a month with knives and decide under the cover of darkness to go out and slash the tires of every car parked on residential streets of a city, and the next day all the tires of every car parked on those streets have in fact been slashed, you may not be able to prove the gang did it, but if it happens enough you might start to suspect and question what is happening and who is responsible.

After covering this for some time now, I am convinced not only does the WEF consistently tell you what they are going to do, they sure love to prepare in advance/undertake all of these preparations before they implement what they are going to carry out.

Virtue signalling, on a global scale. What could go wrong. Inquiring minds would like to know indeed.

Most American citizens today perceive that there exists in our society pernicious forms of socialized religion, politics, and science. Indeed the purpose of this site, The Ethical Skeptic, has always been to point out both the flaws in thinking and know-them-by-their-fruits handiwork of such social skeptics. Our mission has been to help prepare minds, and equip them in spotting the darkened philosophies of those who pretend to represent rationality, critical thinking, virtue, and science itself.

Theirs has always been an intolerant club of royalty-wannbe self-appointed elites, seeking to impress their way to membership or status therein. How best to achieve such lofty status? Become the most uber of the uber themselves. As Admiral William F (Bull) Halsey is known to have quipped regarding war, “Hit hard, hit fast, and hit often.” Indeed, such poseurs view their conquest of society as a form of warfare – with their only option to impress, to escalate therein.

Jessica links to Martenson's excellent video on the recent TGA FOI data that has come out.

She also provides a slide deck outlining the very same integrity / stability problems concerning mRNA product as discussed in the video provided.

If enthusiastic independent researchers find these things and are accurately knowledgeable about them, then I doubt that pharmaceutical manufacturers and regulators did not know.

"Ah yes, the speed of science..." indeed.

For three years China attempted a zero-Covid policy with draconian lockdowns, testing and quarantine. However, that all abruptly changed last month. In a dramatic U-turn, a few cities began opening up before the government announced a country-wide roll-back on 7 December.

Similar U-turns happened in the West, where one day Covid was the most dangerous thing since Ebola to the next day where any dangers were downplayed. Don’t kill your Granny went to ‘living with the virus’ and a similar thing is happening in China.

Valid questions especially with how Covid has mutated over time.

They conclude that vaccinating women during the last 2/3 of pregnancy is a no-no with regard to decreases in protective immunity induced by the flu shot and that based on their results (and the precautionary principle) that maybe it’s a good idea to stop injecting pregnant women (with shit they don’t need).

Maybe, also based on these observations, we should do the same with the experimental COVID-19 injectable products. The modified mRNA products are gene therapies and in no way, shape or form, should pregnant women be being injected with these products. No. Way.

Have we not learned anything from the past? DDT? Thalidomide? Ring a bell?

This.

John Campbell, who has been a nurse and taught nurses for 27 years, has had a gradual journey from full blue pill to red pill.

As of yesterday, he’s now officially on our side as far as the COVID vaccine only (the other vaccines will take more time).

He couldn’t announce his transition on his YouTube channel because they would cancel his channel.

Quite a journey for Dr. Campbell, he followed the data to get where he is now.

I had many pollen allergies. Every spring was unpleasant. I decided to go to an allergist and take allergy shots, which amounted to repeatedly injecting allergens into me. As a result of these repeat antigen shots, my immune system developed non-inflammatory IgG4 antibodies, which mark pollen as a harmless substance to the rest of my immune system and prevent allergic inflammation and nasty symptoms.

There is something important, though: pollen does not replicate.

It is a good idea not to have inflammation in response to pollen. It is a bad idea, however, to train our immune system to ignore replicating pathogens such as Sars-Cov-2.

Have we unleashed a plague of IgG4-related disease on a subpopulation of humans?

If you want some proof to show pro-COVID shot nay-sayers that these shots are detrimental to normal functioning immune responses, read them this. Before I get into this paper that should stop the presses and provide a one-way ticket for a lot of people to prison for the rest of their lives (as a best punishment), I refer to an earlier article that I wrote on immunological tolerance. I wrote this piece on July 10th, 2022, and now this group, who I may add have NO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, have confirmed a mechanism of action of spike tolerance and so yes, the spike protein might be capable of destroying tolerance itself.

Two papers have appeared in quick succession that just need to be put together and I need to tell you what they mean in the context of a more familiar paper. And it’s a real problem. To be honest I wasn’t paying that much attention until my favourite anonymous proteomics scientist sent this message in a telegram group (btw thanks Pavel Durov, you gave us a home when twitter sent us into exile). It was about IgG4.

Mid-Page Summary

So, now we have a problem on multiple pathways leading to the same scenario.

• Suppression of the body’s defence against cancer
• Suppression of the body’s defence against viruses
• Exhaustion of the very components of the immune system that protect against those two things.

Do you know what this reminds me of?

Kaposi’s sarcoma. It’s what happens when your immune system is so depleted it can’t suppress tumours that are unheard of in people that have a functioning immune system.

Let’s appreciate how lucky we all are:

• We are having a great holiday season.
• We did not die last year in the “Winter of Illness and Death for the Unvaccinated.”
• We did not die of overheating, starvation, dust bowl, and massive ocean flooding that was supposed to kill or displace us by 2019.

Let’s talk about the last point: a 1989 AP article explains that the UN predicted a global climate disaster that was supposed to happen within 30 years, so by 2019.

Mask dependency in Japan predated Covid, but it was very much a minority pursuit. But the problem has massively expanded during the pandemic, leading to recent articles about it in the Japanese media.

The Asahi Shimbun (AS) site EduA recently published an interview with psychologist Masami Yamaguchi (MY, pictured below) titled “More children don’t want to show their face. How should children with mask dependence be cared for?” I’ve translated the article since I thought it’d be of interest to people living in countries that have returned to relative sanity. Highlights are all my own. Note that the word “children” in the article encompasses teenagers too.

but what’s going on here is, while a complex system, actually remarkably simple and may well be the mechanism that ties together antigenic fixation/OAS to long covid effects, organ damage, and persistent excess deaths in the covid vaxxed world.

we have been repeatedly told that “these vaccine boosters induce antibody response” as though that proves efficacy and in order to sidestep a need for clinical data. but the reality is much more complex.

just making antibodies means little. you need to know how well they work. produce the wrong ones and you get antigenic fixation and vaccine advantaged virus. this is a known and knowable problem with “leaky” vaccines.

but there are other issues one can run into as well, particularly what the types and roles of antibodies elicited are.

Modern deep learning language models are extremely convincing, to the point where they’re almost able to trick the engineers working on them into thinking that they’re sapient and self-aware. However, they are neither.

OpenAI’s ChatGPT model has recently become available for testing purposes. I thought this would provide us with a perfect opportunity to check in with our machine overlords and see what they think about recent developments. I asked the AI some very pointed questions (including prompting it with boilerplate Neo-Malthusian and socialist ideas to see how it would react), and it came up with some very interesting responses.

Taking bets for when our 'Butlerian Jihad' happens.

It’s been an interesting few weeks in the “COVID conspiracy™” arena (yes that’s us, apparently). Reports of infighting abound - which is bizarre because most of what we have been predicting has come to fruition, particularly the Iatrocide fomented by governments with a combination of lockdowns, masks and the worst vaccines ever.

So, you would think that “Team Reality” (aka #mousearmy) would be chilling on a beach sipping margaritas from their “told you so” mugs.

Not so, apparently. If we haven’t suffered enough over the last three years of medical and scientific fascism.

The apparent sudden death on December 14 of Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha, the eldest daughter of King Maha Vajiralongkorn, has thrown the royal succession of the massively wealthy Chakri dynasty into confusion and raised the possibility of an economic slowdown just at the time the economy is starting to emerge from Covid-19 related problems.

According to a palace statement, the princess remains in hospital, receiving support for her heart, lungs, and kidneys. Prayers have been organized across the country in a massive outpouring for her recovery, with Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha and other officials visiting Chulalongkorn Hospital to present offerings. However, she is widely believed in Bangkok to have died.

El Gato Malo with some Christmas Poetry.

the cats down in whoville were all in good health

and had found a solution for elf on a shelf

because christmas is fun and christmas is funny

they even invited their pal “easter bunny”

Before we consider this study, let me point out that most mutations (in viruses and animals) are deadly and make the organism unable to reproduce. Such was the hope with Molnupiravir: its designers expected that mutations caused by the drug would make the Sars-Cov-2 virus unable to reproduce, thus stopping the infection.

The problem is that SOME mutated copies remain viable - and create new variants!

The study took nine immunocompromised patients, gave Molnupiravir to five, and used four as controls. Within days, the five treated patients developed numerous mutations in the viruses that infected them.

Check out the history behind "EIDD-1931" then come back for horse jokes.

In 2020 it was the lockdowners who destroyed Christmas, and in 2021 it was the vaccinators. All of it was for nothing. Sweden, which never locked down, has lower cumulative excess mortality than Germany, which locked down longer and harder than almost any other country in Europe. Nor did anyone even try to pretend that excluding the unvaccinated from public life would reduce the incidence of infection or death. The vaccinators claim that their elixirs reduce the rate of severe outcome from SARS-2 infection, but mass vaccination has coincided with increases in all-cause mortality and higher rates of transmission everywhere that it has been tried.

Stanford University has been undertaking a multi-phase, multi-year project to eliminate harmful language. To do this they have created a list of words that shouldn’t be used with a suggested alternative.

The list started with the content warning above, just in case reading a word did some permanent damage to the poor, fragile students reading it.

After much derision, the list, which was publicly available was put behind a password protected wall but you can find a copy here.

I’ve highlighted some of the insane (sorry can’t use that word), blacklisted (sorry can’t use that word either) words below.

*Honk Honk*

The scientific publication from Corman et al., with Christian Drosten as the corresponding author, set out principles concerning the PCR testing procedure and is therefore considered critically. An international consortium of experts & scientists have critically analysed this mentioned publication and have found several serious flaws. These flaws, however, are mainly but not entirely of contentual nature. Unfortunately, until now, 30 months later, the Journal and the involved authors failed to come up with counterarguments and explanations. In addition to substantive and conceptual weaknesses, what worries me the most is how fundamental scientific principles have been compromised by the Journal “Eurosurveillance”.

The one paper that made PCR testing the "gold standard" for detecting Covid was approved within days in a process that normally takes months.

Every peer-review process leads to anonymous review reports. When demanding Eurosurveillance to at least release these reports, they said they could not do so due to privacy concerns. However, all peer-review reports are anonymous, so they lied there – most likely to cover up scientific fraud.

And no questions must be asked about it.

As a physician who cares for people with Alzheimer’s disease, Thambisetty spoke about the harms of the drug. “These patients can experience headaches, falls, confusion, vision disturbances and it’s unclear if patients will be able to see obvious benefits on a day-to-day basis,” he said.

The data showed an increased risk of brain bleeds and swelling, i.e. amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) occurred in 126 (14.0%) of subjects in the lecanemab group and only 69 (7.7%) of subjects in the placebo group.

This prompted the FDA to include a warning on the drug about the risk of swelling and bleeding in the brain.

Researching a compound properly takes time. An "accelerated approval process" is a bad idea.

There is no substitute for time.

It is when technology is no longer our servant and we become slaves to technology that problems arise. The technology influences who we are rather than freeing us to discover or develop who we are.

Competition drives technology and technology drives competition. It is the competitive edge that draws many to the latest technological innovation. Where this approach will likely take a devastating turn is in the world of transhumanism. This modernized eugenics, which is a technology of sorts, poses a serious threat to humanity.

The money shot:

Technology did not create the free market. The free market created technology. Individuals, dreaming up a new reality seeking to improve their lives and the lives of those around them, innovate new technology. Transhumanism, is not a product of the free market.

This.

The study was very well designed because the participants were EXPOSED to the Covid infection within five days. Given the exposure, the outcomes were more likely to happen and thus were easier to compare between groups, giving the trial greater statistical power.

The 72% reduction in infection is much MORE effective than the “covid vaccine.”

The trial encompassed the period of Mar-Nov 2022, thus giving us the real-world effectiveness of Ivermectin against the Omicron variant.

While I am happy at the finding, there are several things to be NOT happy about.

Many lives could have been saved, but pushing through an emergency approval for an experimental product was more important. Remember this when your next election comes.

We, the antivaxxers, have been disappointed and angry at Moderna for about two or three years based on mountains of data we unearthed, some of which the FDA tried to hide for 75 years. So, may we ask, what disappointed the FDA advisers so late in the game?

It turns out that the FDA advisers approved Moderna booster shots based on “antibody counting,” a quack medicine approach called immunobridging.

The reason immunobridging is medical quackery is pointed at by the “laughing emoji” above. Despite having “more antibodies,” MORE people in the bivalent group caught Covid compared to people in the monovalent (old booster) group.

The same FDA that rubber-stamped a "tested on 8 mice" Pfizer product for approval.

Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) recently celebrated its 30th anniversary. Naturally, this has led to some renewed discussion of both that film, its sequels, and its predecessor, The Terminator (1984), which famously starred Arnold Schwarzennegger as a villainous killer robot from the future.

Having rewatched both movies recently, I’ve decided to post some thoughts, primarily in regard to how the films both know when to reveal and when to hold back narrative information in order to maximize its impact on the viewer.

Excellent write up, worth it if you hold the first 2 Terminator films in high regard.

Terminator 1 for 80s aesthetics, Terminator 2 for 90s action fun.

Still better then Avatar.

everything, even highly benign health undertakings like exercise have trade offs. these trade offs become critically important in mitigations such as vaccines that are going to be administered widely to healthy people. side effects that might well be acceptable to kill a cancer or delay the onset of diagnosed dementia suddenly look wildly inappropriate when one speaks of prophylaxis. barring some truly outlandish risk experience, pretty much no healthy person takes chemotherapy to try to avoid getting cancer. this is just sensible. it also means that the way we consider our terms and set up the buckets of our bayesian calculations matters a great deal.

Yes.

herd level antigenic fixation is not something humanity has ever grappled with before and that could be with us for a long time.

Yes with a hint of "Welp".

So let’s fast forward to 2020+ where we know that concerns have been expressed about “Shipmanesque” activities in relation to the treatment of elderly patients in nursing homes in the UK being dosed with midazolam instead of treating them with the 3 tablets of antibiotics that was all they probably needed.

So the question now comes…

Is there evidence that elderly patients in NSW were being euthanised for COVID, either because they were “unvaccinated” or because their deaths could then be attributed to the “unvaccinated?

Unfortunately I have come to the conclusion that the answer is yes, and I’m going to explain why.

I (and others) have discussed previously the major anomalies in the death numbers in the unvaccinated category on the NSW vaccine/COVID surveillance reports. The anomaly is so bizarre that it is both difficult to understand and difficult to represent.

There is a degree of base rate fallacy to deal with, but it is hard to ignore that throughout the pandemic the majority of hospitalisations were in the vaccinated cohort. Right now, that is especially pronounced in the 3 - 4 times vaccinated groups.

Likewise, throughout the pandemic NSW has been the most notable in playing with their reporting numbers.

January marks the middle of summer in Australia.

Unfortunately, despite “health experts” hoping that Covid is a seasonal disease and would go away in summer, Australia is in the middle of yet another wave of Covid.

New South Wales, one of the Australian states, publishes “weekly surveillance reports.” Compared to November, COVID hospitalizations more than tripled, according to the latest report.

A look at the data as referenced by Dr Ah Kahn Syed.

COVID-19 Community Corps Membership. Membership does not have its privileges. Blood in, blood out, homies.

Hey, remember when the United States Government paid off the media to cover the Beautiful Herd Culling injections with a positive spin?

Oddly, it was the Biden Administration that doled out the cash just months after Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were both “experimental Trump Vaccine hesitant”?

"Nudging" one hell of a drug.

Imagine making medical decisions based on what "famous" people are saying. Not even once.

Last night I heard from someone operating in much higher circles than me with respect to the COVID scam. He informed me that this is the talk in newsrooms all around the UK:

There is discordant amounts of public commentary, speaking against the narrative. We (the editorial team) cannot allow our paper to fall behind public insight and opinion.

So, they’ve got a bit of a quandry, haven’t they? The tide of public opinion has already turned against them. To continue on their current course of ignoring the facts in favour of the false narrative is just going to make things even more difficult for them to ever regain public trust.

The "Truth Deficit" is working out as predicted.

One of the most significant cultural transformations of the last two years has been the newfound glorification of the pharmaceutical industry.

An industry plagued by decades of fraud, corruption, and criminality managed to quickly rebrand itself as the savior of humanity during the covid-19 crisis.

But nothing inherently changed. Big Pharma still values shareholders’ profits more than people’s lives.

The regulatory agencies still operate as revolving doors to the pharmaceutical giants they are said to regulate.

Big Pharma still dominates lobbying efforts in Washington DC and spends billions each year advertising pharmaceutical products.

If you rotate the Pfizer logo, you can see their motivation.

"Shekels" one hell of a drug.

Yet another Head Girl insists that nobody should be held personally responsible for catastrophic policies that ruined millions of lives and unleashed unprecedented economic chaos.

Alena Buyx works really hard and believes extremely passionately in all the things that all the other people around her believe.

The German Ethics Council is an independent advisory body which has existed in some form since 2001, and which has a mandate to advise the government especially on matters of bioethics. It met its first serious test during the Corona era, when the entire political and bureaucratic leadership decided that the best way to respond to SARS-2 would be to commit massive human rights violations. Naturally, the Ethics Council not only failed to oppose these extraordinary policies, but supported them wherever possible.

Just like our Human Rights Commission.

• CDC’s VAERS safety signal analysis based on reports from Dec. 14, 2020 – July 29, 2022 for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines shows clear safety signals for death and a range of highly concerning thrombo-embolic, cardiac, neurological, hemorrhagic, hematological, immune-system and menstrual adverse events (AEs) among U.S. adults.

• There were 770 different types of adverse events that showed safety signals in ages 18+, of which over 500 (or 2/3) had a larger safety signal than myocarditis/pericarditis.

• The CDC analysis shows that the number of serious adverse events reported in less than two years for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is 5.5 times larger than all serious reports for vaccines given to adults in the US since 2009 (~73,000 vs. ~13,000).

• Twice as many mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reports were classified as serious compared to all other vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%). This meets the CDC definition of a safety signal.

(((They))) knew.

Keep in mind, it has been suggested VAERS has an under reporting factor (URF) of 20 - 60x so the numbers are potentially way worse in the real world.

Shortly after their own Covid vaccination, The Vaccinator exhibited what is now a well-documented side effect of the vaccines, but at the time was still officially denied by all sources due to ‘absence of evidence’ (which is so often conflated with evidence of absence). The Vaccinator went to many doctor’s appointments to deal with this issue and complained bitterly about the symptoms, totally baffled by them. To the best of my knowledge, neither The Vaccinator nor the doctor ever joined the dots that they were dealing with a very common Covid vaccine side effect (if they did, it would have been many months later, after numerous appointments). Remember, this person was responsible for giving informed consent to hundreds, thousands of people before jabbing them with Covid vaccines.

Like any ideology, it will eat itself over time. Question is, will it happen quick enough before more harm is done.

Choice memery and solid writing.

Time for a story in Q+A format. Why?

By now, you have probably heard about the Science Immunology paper showing that people who have received mRNA Covid vaccines produce more of an unusual antibody called IgG4 over time. A number of mRNA skeptics, including me, wrote about it last week.

But the reasons why the paper is so troubling may still not be clear. So here’s a (with luck) digestible explanation, starting with what is probably the most important question: what’s the worst-case scenario?

Meanwhile:

13: "So scientists and health authorities and the vaccine companies are now going to launch an all-hands investigation to figure out how serious this finding might be?"

You’re funny.

IgG4 explained, for normies.

Vinay does a fair and balanced post in regards to vaccines, masks and how people continue to follow "The Science"

The money shot:

The group of people who are most resistant to returning to normal are politically left of center, healthy young people, who may be suffering from an inaccurate understanding of the virus, in some cases complicated by untreated depression or anxiety.

Truly a heavy-hitter, N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) has proven itself for decades and helped save countless lives during this pandemic (at the same time that the FDA was trying to ban its distribution). Besides that, it has potent anti-cancer properties, tremendous antioxidant and anti-inflammatory roles, and enormous benefits for the brain.

Here are some reasons to love NAC.

Short but sweet practical list.

Great when combined with L-arginine if you go to the gym.

One of the most common tactics the medical industry uses to defend against the scrutiny of bad medical practices is to accuse those who question those practices (and thus make the public reluctant to receive them) of “killing their patients!” (under the logic that the treatment is so safe and effective that causing the public to avoid it equates to murder). Although I am used to seeing inflammatory approaches like this being used to silence debates, I was nonetheless quite taken aback by the WHO’s recent tweet.

Midway:

One of the neglected tragedies in medicine is what happens to the children of physicians. These parents on account of their zeal for being anointed authorities of allopathic medicine often default to solving the problems their child encounters by prescribing pharmaceuticals. When the inevitable injuries occur, it is extraordinarily challenging for them to acknowledge that their faith injured their child, and instead these parents default to gaslighting their children, and using more medical treatments to treat these injuries.

Hubris is a "funny" thing...

An honest piece by the Midwestern Doc' discussing Peter Hotez, paediatric vaccines, autism. Most notably, the lengths one person will go through in assuring their own reality matrix cannot be challenged.

After 54 years at the NIH, today marks Dr. Anthony Fauci's last day in office as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). While many were angered by his changing and conflicting recommendations, I am not. They are mere symptoms of a much larger and deeper problem. Dr. Fauci's agency failed to promptly fund key research during the pandemic. That research would have abruptly ended many of the COVID controversies that divided our country.

In a study of NIH funding published in The BMJ, my Johns Hopkins colleagues and I found that in the first year of the pandemic, it took the NIH an average of five months to give money to researchers after they were awarded a COVID grant. This should be unacceptable during a health emergency.

One of many reasons why bureaucratic systems should never be allowed to grow beyond a certain size.

Nice read, with an honest concluding remark.