Pasta News Network - New Zealand

For starters emergency housing is in the social development portfolio. The take-over of motels leading to social mayhem (think Rotorua) has been a tragedy for those housed in them and those in their surrounds. The waiting list for public housing has sky-rocketed since Sepuloni has been Minister.

Worst of all Sepuloni has overseen a rise in children living in unemployed homes. The damage to their outcomes is well researched and documented. But unheeded by this government whose sole focus has been to lift incomes with their fingers firmly in their ears over the unintended consequences of paying people to do nothing ... except have children.

If all of the above is "excelling" I hate to envisage what failing looks like.

Sounds like "Diversity Hire" was more important then competence.

This week I might just as well have sat back and let Pfizer shoot itself in the foot, except mainstream media was missing in action. Project Veritas managed to record a senior Pfizer executive admitting they were conducting experiments aimed at mutating even more virulent strains of Covid. The video accumulated more than 20 million views over 48 hours, but among MSM only Tucker Carlson and briefly the Daily Mail ran with this astounding story. Nothing here in New Zealand, as if the most prolific serial killer in history had been caught in the act, but it was judged unnewsworthy.

Answering a question in the House of Commons this week about record levels of excess deaths, the UK Minister for the Environment Therese Coffey replied briefly that it didn’t matter because it was happening all over Europe. Then abruptly sat down. She said this despite the crisis necessitating the construction of temporary morgues across the UK. It is comments like this, along with the Project Veritas sting, which reveals a striking failure of commonsense behind the official pandemic response. So how could this have happened?

The money shot:

Time to rein in governments intent on extending their power far beyond any recognised remit. Time to annul freedom from legal liability, they lied to us..

Yes, I understand the issue of tainted product, of substituted product and of toxicity, and the need to regulate dietary, or food supplements. But sweeping dietary and food ingredients with a long history of known use, in the same legislative framework as these technologies:

• new chemical entity – Compound never regulated or approved (not an active moiety).

• new molecular entity - active moieties (biologically active) not previously approved

• new active substance – new substance, or mixture of isomers which differ from previously authorised.

• new biological entity – contains human or non-human cells, bacteria, viruses, and material derived from those cells or viruses. Can be modified or engineered (including gene-edited).

...is wrong. And from the start, Andrew Little’s Bill downplays the degree to which the safety and risk from new drugs & biologics remain profoundly uncertain. Iatrogenic injury from medical inventions and drugs is far more extensively documented than dietary and food supplements.

The Bill is so messy, so complex that there is not a clear line of sight to understand how and who is responsible, when something goes wrong.

Long read, but to be expected as this is not a simple topic.

This is what Pfizer had to say about the video in a statement on its official company website (passages of particular significance have been bolded by the editor):

Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight.

In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research.Working with collaborators, we have conducted research where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern. This work is undertaken once a new variant of concern has been identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way for us to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to induce antibodies that neutralize a newly identified variant of concern. We then make this data available through peer reviewed scientific journals and use it as one of the steps to determine whether a vaccine update is required.

Translation: Our "Media & Crisis Teams" are going to be very busy over the next few weeks.

I’m not going to post about COVID anymore. There’s no reason for me to spend my time convincing people not to take these vaccines, as I did throughout 2021. The writing is on the wall by now. The problem hasn’t ended either, excess mortality in 2022 is higher than in 2020 and 2021 and we just had a massive wave from the most brain-damaging COVID variant seen so far, BA.5.

You interfered in the evolutionary dynamics of a sarbecovirus, leading to massive unprecedented waves of infection in the middle of summer and we’ll now find out what the long term repercussions will be. I think it will look like accumulating brain damage and immune damage leading to “mysterious” excess mortality, but time will tell, assuming you’ll still have the cognitive capacity to recognize what happened of course.

But the reason I’m done with this subject is because people don’t really care about understanding any of this.

Dutch bro, no. :(

Project Veritas just released a new video, this one featuring a Jordon Trishton Walker, director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning at Pfizer.

Now maybe the guy is a loon and nothing he says is trustworthy. I’m simply reporting to you what he said.

What he said is damaging enough, though, that the army of Americans who have televisions for brains immediately questioned whether he really held the position that Project Veritas said he did. That attempt was a dead end, since it’s been verified that he is indeed the the person he and Project Veritas both claim he is.

Here’s a sample of what Walker says in the hidden-camera video.

Transcript of the Project Veritas video that has now hit 40+ million views.

I was sceptical at first, but given silence from the usual characters, a press statement from Pfizer, senate questions and the overall state of clown world, I have to consider that this is a legitimate statement from a legitimate employee.

From 2018:

The left believes the opposite. These people are distrustful of the excesses and inequality capitalism produces. They give primacy to group rights and identity. They believe factors like race, ethnicity, and gender compose the primary political units. They don’t believe in strong property rights. They believe it is the government’s responsibility to solve social problems. They call for public intervention to “equalize” disparities and render our social fabric more inclusive (as they define it). They believe the free market has failed to solve issues like campaign finance, income inequality, minimum wage, access to healthcare, and righting past injustices. These people talk about “democracy” — the method of collective decisions.

By these definitions the Nazis were firmly on the left. National Socialism was a collectivist authoritarian movement run by “social justice warriors.” That this brand of “justice” benefited only some based on immutable characteristics perfectly aligns with the modern brand. The Nazi ideal embraced identity politics based on the primacy of the people or “volk” and invoked state-based solutions for every possible problem. It was nation-based socialism — the nation being especially important to those who bled in the Great War.

"if you’re not at the table you’re on the menu."

Long form, very much food for thought.

A 17-year-old male presented with COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis. Six months later, due to chest discomfort with exercise, the patient underwent an exercise stress test that revealed a 3-beat run of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia at 230 bpm at peak exercise. The long-term outcomes of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis are unclear. This patient had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia over 6 months after diagnosis.

See Figure 1, the little white arrow, is pointing at scar tissue.

Interpretation: Although rare, a statistically significant association between BNT162b2 vaccination and myo/pericarditis and AKI was observed. While the association between BNT162b2 and myo/pericarditis has been confirmed internationally, further research is required to understand the association of AKI. BNT162b2 was not found to be associated with most of the AESIs investigated, providing reassurances around the safety of the vaccine.

Page 5:

The safety of BNT162b2 is monitored predominantly through a spontaneous reporting (passive) system by Medsafe, in collaboration with the Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM), with support from the COVID-19 Vaccine and Immunisation Programme within the Ministry of Health New Zealand. This system relies on reports being voluntarily submitted by health care professionals and the public. Although it is effective at signal detection, it can be subject to several limitations, namely underreporting, incomplete reports, limited information on cases and reporting biases.

Remember that in Medsafe's own words "it is estimated that only 5% of all reactions are reported so there is still room for improvement."

Page 12:

These findings provide further reassurance on the safety profile of the vaccine, particularly from a New Zealand specific context. Importantly, studies have found that the risk of any of these AESI following SARS-CoV-2 infection is substantially greater than after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

There it is.

Also, they only looked at 21 days post vaccination when there have been multiple signals there can be problem 60 days out.

With regard to medical and pharmacological research projects, I.G. Farben became involved in experimental programmes using patients from the Nazi regime’s euthanasia programmes and healthy subjects recruited without their consent from concentration camps, on whom various pharmacological substances were tested, including sulfamide and arsenical derivatives and other preparations whose composition is not precisely known (B-1012, B-1034, 3382 or Rutenol, 3582 or Acridine), generally in relation to the treatment of infectious diseases, such as typhus, erysipelas, scarlet fever or paratyphoid diarrhoea.

Furthermore, I.G. Farben played a decisive role in the German army’s chemical warfare programme, contributing to the development of the first two neurotoxic substances, later known as ‘nerve agents’, tabun and sarin.

Some of these activities came to light as a result of the one the famous Nuremberg Trials in 1947, which saw 24 executives and scientists from I.G. Farben brought to justice for, among other offences, the use of slave labour in the concentration camps and forced experimentation with drugs on prisoners.